| COMPARISON ON RATING METHODS FOR FEMALE DUMMY IN NCAP FRONTAL IMPACT TEST |
| K. W. LEE1, J. M. LIM2 |
1Korea Technology Finance Corporation
2Daeduk University |
|
|
|
|
|
| ABSTRACT |
|
From MY2010 US-NCAP, the 5th percentile female Hybrid III dummy has been used for the safety evaluation of the right front passenger position in the frontal impact test. In Korea, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) decided to evaluate the safety of the 5th percentile female dummy in the frontal impact test from 2013 KNCAP. In this paper, using the frontal NCAP data for the 5 vehicles available from the NHTSA test database, the safety of the 5th percentile female dummy were examined. Using the evaluation and rating method by the KNCAP, 5 vehicles received 5 stars. Using the evaluation and rating method by the US-NCAP, only one vehicle received 5 stars and the remaining 4 vehicles received 4 stars. In the US-NCAP, the Nij was the most influential factor for the star rating. In the KNCAP, the evaluation and rating method for the 5th percentile female Hybrid III dummy is less stringent than the method of the US-NCAP. The evaluation and rating method is proposed to increase the stringency of the star rating for the female dummy in the KNCAP. |
| Key Words:
Female dummy, Frontal impact, HIC15, Chest compression, Neck injury, Chest acceleration |
|
|
|
Preview
Full text via DOI
Download Citation 
Print 
